Compliance & Risk (GRC)
Compliance that reflects technical reality, not a parallel spreadsheet universe.
What this replaces
The risk register is a spreadsheet updated before board meetings. Compliance dashboards say green while the scanner queue says otherwise. Auditors ask for evidence and the answer is a week of screenshots.
What Offload does
Compliance posture, enterprise risk management, and business impact analysis unified — and wired to the platform's live technical findings, so dashboards, risk scores, and audit evidence reflect the actual environment.
What you get
- Framework assessments and control posture: ISO 27001, SOC 2, SCF, and more
- Technical findings mapped to compliance controls — failed controls are backed by the findings that fail them
- Enterprise risk register with composite scoring: CVSS, EPSS, KEV, and business context
- Correlators: attack-path combinations, failed controls, and BIA criticality feed risk scoring
- Treatment plans with SLA escalation; risks auto-close when underlying findings resolve
- Business Impact Analysis: RTO/RPO and financial impact per process
- AI-assisted security-questionnaire answering from an approved knowledge base
- Automated audit, customer, and management reporting
How it works
Correlators bridge compliance posture, attack-path analysis, and BIA into risk scoring without duplicating any module's data. Failed controls mint risks; resolved findings close them; every transition is audited.
Assessments combine automated control evaluation (where technical evidence exists on-platform) with guided attestation, producing framework-mapped posture with a defensible evidence trail.
One platform, one risk view
GRC consumes every other module's findings and produces the executive layer above them — one system where the scan result and the audit answer trace to the same record.