AI Governance & AI-SPM
Register, classify, assess, and monitor your AI systems against emerging AI regulation.
What this replaces
AI systems are shipping faster than governance can track them, and the EU AI Act now attaches real obligations to how they're classified and controlled. Most security stacks have no place to register an AI model, let alone assess it.
What Offload does
An AI governance module aligned to the EU AI Act: an AI model registry, risk-tier classification, guided assessments including Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment, bias and fairness testing, drift monitoring, and an audit trail — AI Security Posture Management for the systems your organization builds and operates.
What you get
- AI model registry with ownership, use case, and lifecycle tracking
- EU AI Act-aligned risk-tier classification (prohibited / high / limited / minimal) referencing Article 5 and Annex III
- Guided assessments including Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (Article 27)
- Bias, fairness, privacy, and data-quality testing workflows
- Model health, drift detection, and performance monitoring
- Human-oversight logs, incident records, and an audit trail for regulator review
How it works
Each AI system is registered and classified against EU AI Act criteria, then taken through the guided assessment and testing workflows. Risk classification is a structured, criteria-aligned aid — not a legal conformity determination — designed to make an organization's AI governance defensible and audit-ready.
Governance evidence and risk findings flow into the same risk register and reporting layer as the rest of the platform.
One platform, one risk view
AI governance sits alongside cloud, code, and compliance in one platform — AI risk is managed in the same system as every other risk, not a disconnected spreadsheet.